Can someone explain how this is not lying by the appeals judges? My ex told a mountain of lies and made statements inconsistent with prior statements.
1) With the lower court, I filed a MOTION TO SHOW CAUSE FOR PERJURY, FALSE STATEMENTS, AND OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, which contained 80 exhibits and I filed a witness list with 26 witnesses and 66 exhibits (less than 80 due to line items for bank documents, etc. combined). Lower court denied my motion with no reason given. MOTION FOR REHEARING went through the logic showing inconsistent prior statements, was denied. Appeals judges wrote “defendant’s responses to these allegations were a matter of credibility for the trial court to resolve, Martin, 331 Mich App at 239, and plaintiff did not otherwise offer support for her contention that defendant committed perjury.”
2) Defense counsel said that under my care my children had been “severely burned on a scorching day” and another time said that my “perception of what the truth is, or what is going on, is not reality” (hearsay and slander). Photos showing children 2 days after alleged burn were in denied Motion to Show Cause. Appeals court wrote “plaintiff’s arguments that defense counsel made defamatory accusations against her are not supported by the record.”
Is it worth appealing to MI supreme court, especially since I filed to dismiss the case? Are there any uncorrupted judges? I am reading that you only can appeal to Supreme Court for matters of extreme importance. Does this qualify? = attorney/judicial misconduct (judge won’t recuse herself for lack of impartiality, lack of domestic violence training/expertise, and she is practicing law from the bench), based on how my filings above are answered – judge may be guilty of treason and attorney of misprision of treason, racketeering for extortion, OK with perjury, domestic violence. My judge looks as disheveled in robes as she does in her mug shot for DUI. Her father was a judge. Attorney’s social media headline says that he would kill for a Nobel Peace prize.